Cold Steel said:
I wouldn’t turn to the Jews for arguments against their Messiah, because it was prophesied that they would reject him. Jesus condemned many of them because of their disbelief.
D o you listen to what you're saying? Think about it for a minute:
- You say Jews MUST reject a Messiah claimant to fulfill that specific prophecy (which is NOT found in the original OT scripture: that's a Xian apolegetist interpretation used to justify Jesus' failure to fulfill other specific prophecies).
Here's the claimants:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_messianic_claimants
I'll play along here, for the sake of argument:
If the Jews must reject "the messiah", then how can he lead Jews to assume the Earthly throne and usher in the Messianic Age, and fulfill all the other prophecies? Some prophecy must fail.
I t must've been a good call for Jews to reject all those claimants (including Jesus), since, last time I checked, the Temple hasn't been rebuilt in Jerusalem, etc. No Jewish Messiah yet!
And let's assume for a minute that Jesus accepted the same twisted interpretations of Isaiah used by Xians to justify why the "true messiah" was rejected: why would Jesus be surprised by their rejection, or bother to condemn the Jewish rejecters to Hades? He'd KNOW they were simply doing their part in fulfilling prophecy, thus carrying out God's Will! His condemnation indicates he WASN'T the true messiah, as he'd instead point to their rejection as PROOF, as fulfillment of prophecy, and he'd manage to overcome their objections to assume the throne.
Flip-side is, if Jews actually accepted a given Messiah, they are NOT fulfilling Xian prophecy: hence that Messiah claimant cannot point to that particular fulfilled prophecy (if you accept the interpretation).
The Xian apologetic prophecy fails as being logically inconsistent, no matter how you cut it. They've created a catch-22, an irresolvable paradoxical interpretation.